Jonathan Kamens wrote:
"an old freind" writes:
is it going to realy permited to coment on this propasal
Yes.
no sir it isn't the the fact you a memeber of this are mistaing as I
have shown in rrap on my blog
kb9rqz.blogspot.com
shows that this a farce and fraud
I have made 4
posts so far none have either been posted nor has anything returned to
my email box saying that the post has been rejected
Rejection notices were sent to for the articles
that were rejected. I have confirmed from examining the server logs
that those notices were successfully delivered to hotmail's servers. I
of course can't comment on what happened to them after that.
"Your submission has been rejected because it is off-topic in the
newsgroup news.groups.proposals. This newsgroup is for the
announcement, discussion, and development of active proposals for
changes to the Big 8 hierarchies, as documented at
http://www.big-8.org/. Discussion begins in news.groups.proposals
when the Request for Discussion (RFD) is posted in
news.announce.newgroups and continues until a decision is announced."
nothing about civl and the response was long this an obviosu farce sir
something I will where the posts are not moderated
Your previous two submissions (two, not four) were rejected both
because you quoted the entire RFD in your response and because you were
uncivil.
--
Member of the Big-8 Management Board, www.big-8.org
(Speaking for myself, not for the Board)