RadioBanter - View Single Post - RFD: rec.radio.amateur.moderated moderated

[email protected]

wrote:
On 11 Jan 2007 18:40:17 -0800, wrote:

Lloyd wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:09:35 CST, marc wrote:
Consider this (relatively) new ham all in favor.

Marc, KD5LUR
[this followup directed only to rram and rrap]

The followups in the original RFD were directed to news.groups.proposals
and ONLY to news.groups.proposals for a reason: That group is moderated.
Hence, I trimmed that moderated newsgroup from this thread, because this
thread is not presently following the no crossposts protocol.

So Loyd is a moderator...

he wants to be inded he so all over this I am sure he is not in on it
and fears it come off and leave HIM out

He is speaking as if he were one. I wonder why?

The discussion has just begun, and already you people are incapable of
following directions.

...and already the "you people" remarks start.

yep

He'll be the kind of moderator that Miccolis and Robesin dream of.

Indeed, Mark Morgan is correct that a search of Google Groups reveals
that Paul W. Schleck has NOT been a user of the groups he proposes to
rescue. As a non-user, his credibility will be hurt with the Big 8
Board if they continue with their past behavior. However, the
suggested moderators are not strangers to the rec.radio.amateur news
groups, and that should help immeasurably.

Help with what?

who knows, not sure even lloyd knows what he is saying

But Mark has an axe to grind and actually fears the creation of a
moderated group. That's one of the reasons that I will file a proper
comment to news.groups.proposals in favor of the creation of the new
group. I would like to see abusers like Mark lose their ability to
destroy any rec.radio.amateur news group at will. Should
rec.radio.amateur.moderated be approved, that will be a group which
cannot be vandalized by his kind.

Will forging attributes be tolerated? Will thread jacking be
tolerated?

I suspect some of the thread is likely to happen althought nothing
like RRAP nothing about wether the forgers will allowed to alter
atrubtes and such I don't think the proponent have thought about what
it will take the stop the constan personal attack and fraud

I suspect they will have their hands full with Robesin, if they want to
do a conscientious job of it. He's a slippery one.

There will be no impact on anyone using rrap or rram, because both of
those groups will continue "as is." According to the RFD, the new group
will be an additional group in which noise suppression by means of a
robot will at first be attempted. I see no reason for anyone to oppose
the creation of such a group, and I can see that there is at least the
possibility that it will turn out to be an asset to the amateur radio
community.

So I say, yes! Go ahead and give it a try. Only kooks can possibly
feel threatened by its creation. I will shortly post an affirmative
comment in news.groups.proposals.

Also note that, by posting your comments only to news.groups.proposals,
you will assured that people like Mark can't try out what they call
"thread hijacking." The vandals are powerless there.

Robesin will be powerless? If so, that's reason enough. He's 90% of
this groups problem.

as I have said it has merit they convince that t will be possible to
post thoughts about the ARS that are critical of aspect of the
service and and I will bite

If they can truly asure us I would encourage you to as well

We'll see. The new group just might become a single, monthly posting
from Miccolis on the number of amateur operators. I wonder if that
will be on-topic?