wrote in message
...
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 02:08:16 GMT, Cecil Moore
wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:
wrote:
If he
had only been able to apologize for calling Mark a rapist...
Nobody, including you and me, can prove that he is
not a rapist. It's simply a fact of logic.
The "he" that I used there did not refer to Mark. It
was meant as an impersonal "he" which includes me. I
cannot prove that I am not a rapist. It is generally
impossible to prove a negative.
indeed which is Why Robeson action in making that acussation are and
remain despectable
I have occionaly managed to prove a negitive but it is rough
Sure you have, Mark. Just like you are a geophysicist, a Colonel in the
Army, and a consultant.
How does a person who cannot spell "negitive", prove one?