RadioBanter - View Single Post - RFD: rec.radio.amateur.moderated moderated

an_old_friend

wrote:
wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:41:24 -0500, "Tex" OutYonder@up wrote:

wrote in message
oups.com...

Lloyd wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:09:35 CST, marc wrote:
Consider this (relatively) new ham all in favor.

Marc, KD5LUR
[this followup directed only to rram and rrap]

The followups in the original RFD were directed to news.groups.proposals
and ONLY to news.groups.proposals for a reason: That group is moderated.
Hence, I trimmed that moderated newsgroup from this thread, because this
thread is not presently following the no crossposts protocol.

So Loyd is a moderator...

The discussion has just begun, and already you people are incapable of
following directions.

...and already the "you people" remarks start.

Indeed, Mark Morgan is correct that a search of Google Groups reveals
that Paul W. Schleck has NOT been a user of the groups he proposes to
rescue. As a non-user, his credibility will be hurt with the Big 8
Board if they continue with their past behavior. However, the
suggested moderators are not strangers to the rec.radio.amateur news
groups, and that should help immeasurably.

Help with what?

But Mark has an axe to grind and actually fears the creation of a
moderated group. That's one of the reasons that I will file a proper
comment to news.groups.proposals in favor of the creation of the new
group. I would like to see abusers like Mark lose their ability to
destroy any rec.radio.amateur news group at will. Should
rec.radio.amateur.moderated be approved, that will be a group which
cannot be vandalized by his kind.

Will forging attributes be tolerated? Will thread jacking be
tolerated?

There will be no impact on anyone using rrap or rram, because both of
those groups will continue "as is." According to the RFD, the new group
will be an additional group in which noise suppression by means of a
robot will at first be attempted. I see no reason for anyone to oppose
the creation of such a group, and I can see that there is at least the
possibility that it will turn out to be an asset to the amateur radio
community.

So I say, yes! Go ahead and give it a try. Only kooks can possibly
feel threatened by its creation. I will shortly post an affirmative
comment in news.groups.proposals.

Also note that, by posting your comments only to news.groups.proposals,
you will assured that people like Mark can't try out what they call
"thread hijacking." The vandals are powerless there.

Robesin will be powerless? If so, that's reason enough. He's 90% of
this groups problem.

Considering the FACT that Mark posts hundreds of times to Steve's occasional
post, the "problem" exists solely in Mark Morgan's jumbled noggin'.

hi steve

Steve currently post only occasionaly atleast in his own name
(anymouses it seems more)

If you'll go back up to "Loyd's" response to my last post, you'll see
where he couldn't resist forging the attribute chain. That Robesin is
posting everyday is a given.

second what has the number of my post got to with anything I have
unaware there was a numerical quoate on posting

Only Google limits the number of postings in any one session.

and obviously the problem exists outide my head as BB sees and len
anderation and few other

Well, I see this sort of thing as a disruption of the group.

I agree BTW it was a dispution of the NG I regret that but decided it
was the lesoor of eveil at that and the Disputing a Ng whose primary
prupose was harassment seem like less an evil than surrender to the act
of a cyver terorist

However,
there was a valid purpose for it and it seems to be working.

thank you and again I doi regret but I would have regretted not doing
it more

Robesin
as Robesin has all but disappeared, or rather has been driven
underground to post his bile as an anonnie.

mostly and it will take awhile to "earn' more vacation time

Nevermind that Robesin as
Robesin has posted chapter after chapter about how despicable anonnies
are.

sociopaths never think the rules that aply t others apply to them

He is a man without conscience.

oopps just noticed I have already seen this one amazing how different
some post in 2 different Newraders