I wonder what was Mr.Reay's purpose in publishing
his rather silly and somewhat infantile attention
seeking outburst that is quoted from him below?

Was it to demonstrate that not only is he a _LOSER_,
but that he is well aware of the fact?

Was it to demonstrate that anybody who holds, or who
has ever held, an M3/CB Fools' Licence can never be
a _REAL_ Radio Ham because of the associated
gentlemanly traditions?

Was it to demonstrate the really big mistake that was made
when the gangrenous degeneration that is the M3/CB Fools'
Licence was introduced?

Was it a further Freudian Slip on his part showing that
the insecurity that he holds to be in every _REAL_ Radio
Ham is a part of every fibre of his being and that he is
trying to make himself feel better by blurting out some
playground-style insults?

Was it to demonstrate that his sneering 'n' jeering in
the company and style of so many of the toilet-mouthed
gutter-denizens of this NG makes him a CBer fair and square?

Was it to demonstrate that the RSCB, of whose politbureaux
he is a significant member, has degenerated into a
cesspit of CBers and is no longer relevant to Ham Radio?

Was it to make a fool of himself in front of Victoria,
Rebecca and Michaela when the time comes that he is no longer
able to censor their Usenet access, and they get to see
what a hypcrite he is by comparing his behaviour against
the standards that he imposes on them as they grow up?

Was it to demonstrate that despite his _BOASTS_ of being in
possession of a number of degrees that he is incapable of
stringing two or more words together in a civil and rational
discussion?

Was it to demonstrate that once again, having sneered 'n'
jeered in the CB fashion he is going to run away when
challenged?

Was it because he was annoyed that his gaffe in stating
that e^(-jwt) was a function that decreased with increasing time
was so well publicised, and he wanted to stamp his tiny little
foot in a pique of anger?

"Brian Reay" wrote in message
...
Our if they are 'too heavy' (eg RA17)