January 19th 07, 12:01 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,554
|
|
People who aren't on RRAP
Dee Flint wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
Dee Flint wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
Dee Flint wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
Dee Flint wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...
wrote:
wrote:
will be deciding what to do with it...
http://www.qrz.com/ib-bin/ikonboard....T&f=3&t=142786
How will they do that?
They will use the proposed method. What did you think?
Those folks aren't proposing to shut down RRAP. They are simply
proposing
to create a moderated version.
They are?
People will have the choice to post to either or both
newsgroups.
They will?
However,
much of what gets posted to RRAP will not get through the
moderation
process
on the other group.
It won't?
By your first question above, you indicate that you don't know
very
much about the process. Now you pretend to have all of the
answers.
Besides, why should it bother you if people who aren't on rrap
decide
what to do with it?
They aren't doing anything to rrap. It will continue to exist and
those
who
wish to do so will continue to post.
Dee, N8UZE
I think the express purpose is to limit those who would wish to
continue to post.
It does not stop anyone from posting to rrap.
Dee, N8UZE
I'm sure you'll enjoy your little cocoon where never is heard a
dissenting opinion.
Well that's interesting because the moderators will either have to block
me
or block everyone else since I've disagreed with most people at one time
or
another on something. The cross postings from outside the amateur radio
groups the last few days have really been annoying.
Dee, N8UZE
Dee, it's no worse than Robesin's "excrement eating" posting, but no
one seems to mind that.
Well I've found that it's pointless and ineffective to admonish those who
post objectionable material. I'm not going to waste my time.
Robesin interprets that as "approval."
Much more fun
to debate license classes.
Dee, N8UZE
|