Bob Brock wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
Bob Brock wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...

Now, a better question would be, if the current test procedure produce
operators capable of functioning at the minimum entry level for that
particular classification of ham, why would we feel compelled to change it?
Bear in mind, I'm not opposed to proposing a change to the testing method
provided there is a tangable benefit to it beyond simply making it harder to
get a ticket.

I agree a much better question don't expect an answer from jim though

and yes if I am shown a better method that will work at least as well
etc and serve th interest of the public and the ars i will be all for
it but on the scale of how hard the test should I want the number to be
1.0 enough units if that can not be assured Id rather have the test be
0,9 enough units than 2 or more enough units