View Single Post
  #19   Report Post  
Old January 28th 07, 07:33 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
[email protected] N2EY@AOL.COM is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 877
Default Schlecks' direction on moderation


Dee Flint wrote:
"Michael Black" wrote in message
...

[snip]

I'm not convinced that the moderators for this proposed newsgroup actually
need to be hams. Some guy walking in off the street is just as capable
as making most of those judgements as anyone else. The caveat being
that their unfamiliarity with the hobby might make them let things slip
through, when they didn't know the difference between amateur radio and
CB or something else. But even then, that's not tied to needing a piece
of paper, it's tied to whether someone is familiar enough with the hobby.

I would argue that there is a bias in even making an analogy to higher
learning. Because there is something about the tone of all this proposed
newsgroup that sure seems to place it in academia, and I'm not convinced
that is a good thing.

Michael VE2BVW


I would agree that the moderators only really need to be people of good
judgment.


I agree to a point.

I would also add that they should be knowledgeable about the subject,
and willing to require proof of claims made by posters.

For example, some time back, it was posted here that *all* amateurs
whose
licenses were expired but in the grace period could continue to
operate.
The reality is that such operation is a violation of FCC rules unless
the
licensee has filed for renewal.

Someone who is not familiar with the rules might accept that mistake
as fact,
and allow it to be posted unchallenged. Not a good thing.

None of us really object to off-topic posts to any great degree.
What is objectionable is that there are several people who seem to feel a
need to stoop to name calling, profanity, vulgarity, ad hominem attacks and
so on rather than indulge in the simple pleasure of debate.


I agree 100%.

You will notice that the most vehement of those opposing the moderated news
group are those that have the worst behavior. It seems that all they really
want is to insure that they have targets to continue their tactics.


I am convinced that, for some the "pleasure of debate" consists almost
entirely of those attacks.

Of course we could just filter them but every few days you have to add
another as they keep coming up with new IDs. My killfile is huge these
days.


Exactly.

73 de Jim, N2EY