RadioBanter - View Single Post

John Smith I · January 29th 07, 04:30 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy

wrote:

...

N2EY:

So, you are looking for information ...

Well, Paul W. Schleck is a politician, he can say one thing and do
another, simple really, you see it all the time. The moderation groups
intention is to stop all board discussion on amateur radio and only
support the wishes and steerage of a relatively few hams--especially
those of a certain group of extra class license holders. They mean to
keep the old class system, established on morse, in effect.

You do not need to listen to the lies to know the truth I have stated
above, you only need to watch their actions ...

one-hundred-and-seventy-four-postings? Geesh, I must be getting old,
when I was younger I would have quadrupled that number by now--just
demonstrates the necessity for recruiting new blood in here!

By "balance", I mean the group of moderators should represent the true
"picture" of all amateurs. The moderators composed of all extras is a
DEAD GIVEAWAY it does not--that seems a simple enough concept to grasp,
to me.

Now on crude, vulgar, posts on sexual preference, and completely "off
base" posts--we agree. At least that pleases me to no end. NEVER ALLOW
THEM!

Seems we agree on "friendly" posts which might miss the topic by a point
or two, pose no one an attack and simply do no harm. This pleases me,
our agreement they SHOULD be tolerated.

However, you darn well know there are many extras who DO attempt to be
"Lord" over the "peasant" tech-holding-no-coders. That is a damn lie.
Posts which have gone here before more than support that. I am sure
anyone reading this has memories of those posts.

Seems we can also agree, the public airwaves are just that, public.
Methods and means need to found and implemented to place these back into
the hands of Joe Blow Public--where they belong ...

Now, as to Paul, he has consistantly shown real "political talents", he
simply promises all things to everyone. In the end you get a moderation
group of Paul and his henchmen--that is SLICK!!! And, I am sure the
techs are thrilled. I don't even think the generals appreciate that
much ... You know as well as I, Paul imagines his little robo-guard on
duty, armed with ip addys, newsserver ips and names, just ready to
killfile posts from those NOT supporting their ideas. Close your eyes,
you can see it to--called "human conspiracy." That bunch would allow
Len in to point out their faulty thinking about as willingly as I would
live with a rattlesnake! There is much truth in Lens' posting,
sometimes they are just a bit cryptic and it has to be "dug" for.
However, those he points 'em at are so blinded by their egos, they think
it is all BS--it ain't ...

We will see about posting some of those old posts I referred to here,
when I need them, you will see them ...

However, N2EY, you have at least "textually" made concessions I did not
expect! At first I am tempted to think I "had you all wrong." Then I
remember the "Standard Tactics of the Extras", which is "Say One Thing,
Do Another."

However, I hold out hope ...

Regards,
JS