RadioBanter - View Single Post - Unwritten policy and the intent of the average amateur ...

Dave Heil · February 3rd 07, 07:34 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy

wrote:
On Feb 3, 5:28�am, wrote:
On Feb 1, 8:15 pm, wrote:

On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 18:35:34 -0500, Leo wrote:
On 31 Jan 2007 15:33:35 -0800, wrote:
On Jan 30, 8:03?pm, "
wrote:
"Bob Brock" wrote in message
"Dee Flint" wrote in message
"Bob Brock" wrote in message
On 28 Jan 2007 13:11:46 -0800, " wrote:
snip
Now you will do one of two things: either ignore this post entirely,
or
respond to it in your usual manner, with name-calling, insults, etc..
The one thing you *won't* do is respond in a civil fashion, answer
the questions I posed, or even call me by my first name and/or
callsign.
*tsk*. �Sucked in again - hook, line and sinker.
Poor guy. �Just can't help himself!
why does Jim think he ahs the right to be called by His name he
certainly does not object to others not being called by theirs
Thou shalt not take Jim's name in vain

Why not? He does. He's about as vain as any morse
monkey. :-)

[see dumpster diving for transceivers under $100 cost,
see "having friends and neighbors over to admire his
work," see stories of travail of teen-agers taking many
busses to reach a very official FCC Field office, etc.]

You're still a horse's patoot, Leonard.

Dave K8MN