RadioBanter - View Single Post

topcat

Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:
Lloyd Davies wrote:

MY CB HANDLE IS BODACIOUS

http://i11.tinypic.com/4dg2gp1.jpg

**** off, fatty!

http://img206.imageshack.us/img206/9...ddaviesle7.jpg

"Not Lloyd" anon@anon wrote in message ...

Which part of third grade did you miss?
I posted to no "scaner" forum. Is there such a beast?

Even Trailer Trash know how to spell "****in'" idiots. Use '****ing' or
'****in', there is no E in the word.
But again, what do no-code scanner freaks know about spelling other than
to
sound it out around two already badly decayed teeth? You cain't hep it
iffin' yer mommy and yer daddy were brother and sister.

sounds like your typical all american family situation
dunnit ?

"wîthhËld fØr rËåsØñs Øf ñåtîØñål SËÇürîty" wrote in
message
...

****EN IDIOTS!

CROSS POSTING AMATEUR RADIO **** IN SCANER FORUM AGAIN!
**** OFF! GET A LIFE!

Barry OGrady wrote:

On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 11:32:52 -0500, pltrgyst

wrote:

On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 14:13:46 GMT, "Harold E. Johnson"

wrote:

Give the ham ticket another go. It's a great hobby despite the best

efforts

of that little publishing company in Connecticut, the QCWA and a few
disgruntled idiots that have to have some reason to think themselves

better

than others even if it's only through an obsolete mechanical skill

likely

teachable to a reasonably smart chimpanzee.

If you truly believe all that, then you should also believe that ham

(Indeed,

any) radio is an obsolete communications medium, since the world is now
hard-wired.

And if the chimp can learn Morse, why can't aspiring hams? Morse is
easy

at

lower speeds. Anyone who can't master it at up to 15wpm surely isn't

bright

enought to to be trusted with his paws on the controls of a
transmitter.

Why bother? I have a full amateur radio license with no morse.
Morse was removed as a requirement years ago.

The primary justification for allocation of amateur radio spectrum has

always

been emergency services. And in dire emergencies, operators might have

to cobble

together makeshift equipment. In that case, it's much simpler -- and

possibly

the only solution -- to build a cw transmitter than it is to come up

with

modulation. Hence cw has always been the ultimate disaster scenario

fall-back,

and should always remain a licensing requirement.

Amateur radio is a hobby.

Otherwise, who needs hams, and why should they get any of the public

radio

spectrum?

AR has way too much spectrum, but it does deserve some.

-- Larry

Barry
=====
Home page
http://members.iinet.net.au/~barry.og

---
avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 0666-0, 12/30/2006
Tested on: 12/31/2006 3:39:17 AM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com

---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 0666-0, 12/30/2006
Tested on: 12/31/2006 3:42:50 AM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com