On Feb 7, 7:03�pm, Leo wrote:
On 7 Feb 2007 15:29:04 -0800, wrote:
On Feb 7, 4:40?pm, Leo wrote:
On 7 Feb 2007 03:25:23 -0800, wrote:
...nothing but evasive drivel.
Entire post skipped!
Leo, I think you realized that I have
seen through your cunning plan,
What cunning plan? *
and was not trapped by it. But
rather than admit that I have outsmarted
you, my post is labeled "evasive drivel"
and snipped.
Isn't it? * *
No.
I repeat the relevant question:
If I give you one example of a factual error
that Len has made in the past few days, but which I have not yet
corrected, will you agree that I have proved my point?
Of course - so long as it predates my original post!
Ah - so you add a condition!
Nevertheless, it's a simple task to find an uncorrected factual error
in Len's postings here.
Scroll back up this thread to January 30. See the post Len made at
7:56 PM (at least, that's the time Google lists.
In that long, long post, Len says:
""CB" came into being in 1958."
But that's incorrect. By a whole decade.
My point is proved.
73 de Jim, N2EY