View Single Post
  #75   Report Post  
Old February 18th 07, 07:26 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
Paul W. Schlock Paul W. Schlock is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Feb 2007
Posts: 16
Default Another Morgasm


wrote in message
news
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 13:49:10 -0500, "Dee Flint"
wrote:


wrote in message
oups.com...

[snip]


I'm rarely surprised when an amateur behaving badly turns out to be a
20WPM Tested Extra.


This is the same type of stereotyping as saying that no-code Techs are CB
hams.


only to someone with poor english skills


......or poor writing skills.

This stereotyping has no validity.


wrong again it is has been shown over and oover again that the extra
class ahs the highest rate of offender

Just as an FYI, one of the worst
jammers on the west coast was a Technician.


this howver is your putting down the techs again


Poor Markie, always the victim.

These behaviours have nothing to do with one's license class........


an unpsupprted assertion


Actually, Markie, her observation is common sense, something you lack.


........ and everything
to do with the individual's already existing personality.


wihich likely plays a factor in the offender class of license too


An undocumentable assertion is wrong for Dee but acceptable for you?
Only in your convoluted mind....


Dee, N8UZE

www.ipunce.blogspot.com