On Feb 17, 3:13 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message

...



David Gleason, wrote:
Welfare?

I see. Your income comes from where?

Several sources, none of them being welfare, prancer boy!

All of them sharing the commonality that they come from the government, as
opposed to money you earned, right?



Actually, it was given me at the time of my baptism... which was about 50
years before the date you name

Absolutely pathological!

Just simply true...
...



Yeah, since it needs saving might as well QRM!

The way you seem to prefer is to reduce interference by having stations
fall
silent.

No, I'd like them to drop HD/IBOC. Pay attention, prancer!

Considering that AM is dying (nearly nobody under 35 ever listens) what you
are saying is that you want th eonly potentially viable solution for AM to
be discarded, which will result in a guarantee that AM will die, and soon.



Nobody but a few DXers really cares abut adjacent channel reception in
the
shadow of a powerful local signal.

Nobody?

Yeah, statistically, nobody.

AM dying - hardly:

The only things that are dying aer digital radio in Canada and IBOC
AM:

http://americanbandscan.blogspot.com...in-canada.html

"RW Opinion: Rethinking AM's future"

"Only 175 or so AM stations have even licensed AM-HD. For a number of
reasons, quite a few have tried it and taken it off the air, or so the
anecdotal evidence suggests. (Ibiquity no longer reports in its public
summaries whether a station is on the air.)"

http://www.rwonline.com/pages/s.0044/t.557.html

Bye bye, AM IBOC !