On Feb 22, 10:16 pm, "K7ITM" wrote:

I have no time at the moment to read your draft, but I can tell you
that there is a very good qualitative explanation in King, Mimno and
Wing, "Transmission Lines, Antennas and Waveguides." I have a PDF of
the antennas chapter... I also know that in Johnson and Jasik there's
a corresponding explanation with a bit more detail. In a nutshell, in
the so-called shielded loop antenna, the antenna is the outer surface
of the outer conductor, and the feedpoint is the gap in this
conductor. The center conductor is merely a transmission line to
conduct the signal from the feedpoint to where it is used. It is
balance that yields the "magical properties," and it is possible to
build an antenna with good balance without making the loop out of
coaxial cable. The magical properties are generally taken to be
rejection of nearby electric fields (not electromagnetic fields), and
a symmetrical pattern.

Cheers,
Tom

I agree. There are no magic properties to a shielded loop. All the
design
does is to ensure balance. I've done careful tests comparing a
shielded
loop, vs a good unshielded loop. I could not tell a lick of
difference.
It's all in the balance. An unshielded loop can be just as good, if
the balance is good. And thats not hard to achieve. If I really
thought
shielded loops were better, I would use them. But I don't, so I
don't.
I have a 44 per inch side unshielded loop right next to me. "5 turns"
It's my best loop of the bunch I have tried, and it's the one I stuck
with. BTW, I have also tested using shielded loops as the "coupling"
loop. Again, not a lick of difference being both versions of mine were
well balanced.
MK