View Single Post
  #10   Report Post  
Old February 24th 07, 02:21 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
[email protected] nsarejectnsareject@yahoo.com is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 321

On Feb 23, 11:22?pm, "Guerite?" wrote:
"I have been researching/posting on this subject for a year, and have a
zillion links set up, and know exactly how and where to find information, to
counter little punks like you and David Edurado"

-- amazing how much time you have wasted in your old age --





"A recent Arbitron/Edison Media Research study found that more than
one-third of Americans are interested in HD Radio, but nearly half said

they
would only purchase an HD Radio if it cost $100 or less."


http://www.hdradio.com


RW: What are your thoughts about whether or how AM should go digital at
night?


Mathews: I think there are problematic issues. The long and short of it is

a
lot of AM stations, just like FMs, have been getting reception in areas
where they aren't really technically protected. . But, at some point .

they'
re going to have to give up what they've been sort of getting for free all
this time anyway, that sort of non-protected listening area. .


[TRANLATION (in the voice of Don La Fontaine): AM IBOC DXing IS FOR REAL!]


RW: Because AM has to go digital at night. .


Mathews: It's one of those things where everybody is saying, "It can't
happen."
And I've said this from the beginning on HD, none of this is a question of
"If," it's a question of "When."


RW: Do your listeners notice when you go digital?


Mathews: They have no concept unless they have an HD Radio.


http://www.rwonline.com/pages/s.0049/t.352.html


Just as " has no concept.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Dumb **** Guerite HD/IBOC Shill