"art" wrote in message
oups.com...
On 1 Mar, 06:41, Jon Kåre Hellan wrote:
John Smith I writes:

Dan Andersson wrote:

...
So if someone sits on the VB code for EZNEC, just rebuild it .Mono on
Linux
BUT LINK IT STATICALLY! This means the code will run on almost all
varietys
of Linux!
//Dan, M0DFI

My gawd man. Let us hope no serious program is ever written in Visual
Basic!

Oh, I forgot, some idiots did do that, didn't they?

I don't think that was called for.

We may like Linux, but programming just for Windows doesn't make
somebody an idiot.

73 de LA4RT Jon, Trondheim, Norway

The bottom line should be is EZNEC accurate? Has the programming been
held within the confines provided by the original provider'
the U.S. government. Who overseas the content of this so called
program. If it has a patent then all would or should be revealed
in the patent disclosure. Has anybody taken this for his own use for
the advancement of science which is the reason for patents?
Has anybody upgraded the assigned patent for the sake of science
or has something not been disclosed to prevent true examination
and as such invalidates the patent? Does the government have the
option of review of all algorithms or are they in the same position
the country is with voting machines? Basically the purchaser is really
in the position of caveat emptor especially since all programs provide
different results!
Art

Art,
wouldn't it be better if you picked knitting or bird watching?
You would not have to deal with all of us morons and overseas governments
that don't get your brilliance.

bada BUm