On 2 Mar, 11:35, Dave wrote:
chuck wrote:
Dave wrote:

Cecil Moore wrote:

Dave wrote:

Cecil, as an engineer you should stick with standard vocabulary.

Just trying to appease the physicists, Dave. They are
arguing that it is not power until work is done.

A Poynting vector is watts/square angle [watts/degree^2]. It is not
being dissipated in free space. It is Diverging [vector relationship].
How do the physics type adjust their definition to include the
Poynting Vector?

I'll sit back and read the follow up posts for the next few weeks :-)

And now one for the engineers!

How do you interpret a non-zero Poynting vector determined by static E-
and H- fields?

73,

Chuck

Static fields, by definition, do not have a time varying divergence. No time
variation, no Poynting Vector. Nes Pas?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Then what you do is add a time varying field to a static field and add
something like " during a period of time " to Gausses law.
What on earth is your problem? Show a bit of inititive !
Art