KH6HZ wrote:
wrote:

So let's assume for discussion that the current requirements
for Extra remain the same. Is it reasonable to ask *all* new
hams to learn all that material to get a license? I say it's not.

Which is *EXACTLY* the argument NTI (No-Test International) Members are
going to start to use now to start the push to make the theory examinations
'easier'.


73
kh6hz



Well, I wouldn't worry about that too much. Unless they can make a
legitimate argument that the questions are
unnecessary/irrelevant/illogical or are "self-protectionist" and simply
meant to make the test over-difficult so as to control numbers or who
can enter amateur radio, what would give them a leg to stand on?

Perhaps they could also make the argument that the tests are
"obsfucated", deliberately misleading or "entangled with deliberate
complexity" in an effort to confuse and mislead. However, that would be
quite apparent to the avg educated joe who is familiar with
radio/electronics.

No, unless they would have a legitimate argument, they would most likely
be dismissed along with any of their false claims.

JS
--
http://assemblywizard.tekcities.com