Congratulations Art
On 5 Mar, 16:24, Richard Clark wrote:
On 5 Mar 2007 12:53:23 -0800, "art" wrote:
It produces the same results every time when adressed
which is not the same as in NEC program useage.
Hi Art,
Two things wrong with this statement:
1. You have no same results;
2. You have no NEC results.
There are no approximations or excuses or fudge factors pencilled in
the analyis.
You refuse to discuss the obvious errors of:
1. Scale (explain how 6 inch elements resonate at 200 MHz);
2. Elements described as orthogonal to an axis (they are not);
3. Any number of gain claims through software you challenge as
inaccurate;
4. Ignoring historical work that has preceded you.
Shame oh shame
Congratulations! A comment like that, would probably get you
kill-filed from the new moderated group - which makes you a troglodyte
like the rest of us. ;-)
Have you though of cleaning up your act and doing a dog and pony show
for them?
73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
|