In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in
message

.com...
In article , "Mike"
wrote:

"Guerite©" wrote in message
...
In any case, HD sounds far better than any analog signal. HD
radio stations will abandon analog and redirect the full station
power of their amplifiers towards the HD digital stream.


Indeed. I just checked at www.hdradio.com. I had no idea there
were so many HD FM stations in my city (6). All have a 2nd
channel also, so this makes 6 new stations in my city!

I'll certainly be getting a HD radio this year, and I don't
understand all the opposition to it in this group. Is it just a
case of old farts/curmudgeons opposing something new? I *really*
don't understand the idea of clinging to what is essentially 100
year old technology - analog radio. Are some of you lamenting
the death of incandescent light bulbs also?

HD radio will happen much like HD TV did. Prices will drop until
Critical Mass is reached, then it will take over. Once you see
HD TV, you realize how bad the old system was.

It trashes my reception. Is that so hard to understand?

Does it trash any station in your market area in its primary coverage
area? Even the FCC understands that we are going to sacrifice fringe,
non-protected non-primary reception for the opportunity to preserve
free terrestrial radio.

Well OK. I understand it, you understand it, the FCC understands it so
why is this abortion going on?

--
Telamon
Ventura, California