On 8 Mar, 14:35, wrote:
art wrote:

snip

Your choice Roy Since you have never had reason to place revisions on
your programs! ( you consider your self as always being right) I see
your point. It has been correct from the get go.

Are you out of your friggin' mind?

The current releases of eznec are 3.0.58 and 4.0.34; sounds like a
revision or two to me.

snip remaining babbling, arm waving, idiotic, utter nonsense

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

My point is that Roy is not free from error Jim and you just made my
point.
Over the last few months or even longer I have tried to rationalise
the
correctness of gaussian arrays in early programs .All experts
determined that such a thing is an error. So now I feel that so called
error should be
removed or subject to some sort of over view. As you know minninec was
one of the early programs as well as Annie to come about over thirty
years ago
and later spawned other verions that have no independent oversite. If
the product is incorrect and I am going by Roys newsnet and amateur
group then programmers should be alerted to it. The collection of
experts if we can call them that state there is no connection between
statics and electromagnetics which this derivitation is spawned from.
If they are correct then the program should be corrected and other
programs that spawn from it should also be checked. This problem has
been thoroughly discussed
by many people of this group and they have come to a consensus albiet
as amateurs so shouldn't their words be headed despite what Roy says?
Art