art wrote:
On 9 Mar, 06:49, Gene Fuller wrote:
art wrote:

But Jimmie my friend, now you have an understanding of Gaussian law
what is preventing you adding the metric of time or a length of time
to the statics law?

Art,

Adding the "metric of time" is exactly what J.C. Maxwell did, in 1865.
The detailed hard work surrounding Maxwell's Equations, as we know them
today, was probably more attributable to Oliver Heaviside. However,
Maxwell gets the credit for adding the time contribution.

73,
Gene
W4SZ

But he did not associate it with antennas period.

Correct, he described EM fields in general.

In the previous post
I applied the same logic to an antenna array and using the initial
logic that Gauss used and which Maxwell enlarged upon for other
reasons. And to follow the logic applied by Gauss one must focus on
equilibrium such that the static particles on the enclosed antenna
array MUST be in equilibrium or else all falls apart inside the
enclosed border. Remember that static particles reside on the surface
of a radiator when energy is not applied.

Babbling nonsense.

The existance of static particles (whatever the hell they are, I presume
you mean electrons) on the surface of a radiator has nothing to do with
applied energy (other than maybe wind energy).

It departes from the SURFACE when energy is applied and continues to
do so as time passes by in a time varying form until time stops where
at that time it must be in a state of equilibrium in static form Q.E.D

More babbling nonsense.

EM waves depart when energy is applied, not particles.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.