On Mar 9, 10:31 pm, "Mandy" anon@anon wrote:
wrote in message

ups.com... On Mar 9, 9:53 pm, "Mork" Dork@anon wrote:

Steve merely voiced the findings and added
to them.

Robesin adds nothing to the discussion except sexual inuendo and
accusations that Mark's wife is a man.

But..but...it is OK for Mark to outright state that Steve's wife should have
aborted their daughter?

Doesn't a woman have the right to choose?

And prove to us that Mark's alleged wife is of one gender or another. We
have no proof that she is even his wife.

What has this to do with amateur radio policy?

It's none of your business. None of Robesin's business either.

In fact, Dee rightfully defended the VE's

So less than two dozen ( 24) amateurs aren't enough to make up a VE
team? That IS news to me.

How many of them are accredited VE examiners? Can you show me that?

Can you? You're the one claiming that Mark lied.

that Mark wrongfully accused of
being "pro code", and who, according to Mark, refused him a test
session.

So who was this VE? What did he/she tell you about the discussion he
had with Mark?

I'd like to know that myself. We have only Mark's "word", and Mark has been
known to twist the facts to suit his eternal victim status.

No, we have Robesin making accusations. I'd like to know which VE he
talked to and got this information.

Dee has a great amount of credibility.

Dee is a cheerleader for Morse Code and the ARRL. That's known as
"bias."

Dee is well educated. That apparently rankles you and Mark.

Well educated people can be biased. No collitches even specialize in
it.

Mark has none. Dee has never misled
or printed falsehoods in these groups. Mark has.

So has Robesin and Deignan. How many amateurs are in their
"Hoods?" (Good luck on getting a valid address for Deignan.)

Why would I want same? Better yet, why would YOU want same?

I could care less how many amateurs have to suffer with those two on
their local repeaters.