On Mar 10, 12:38 am, "Mandy" anon@anon wrote:
"Dee Flint" wrote in message

. ..





wrote in message
oups.com...
On Mar 9, 9:53 pm, "Mork" Dork@anon wrote:

[snip]

So less than two dozen ( 24) amateurs aren't enough to make up a VE
team? That IS news to me.

If the numbers presented earlier were correct, it would not matter if they
were all VEs. They could not have tested Mark since only one of them held
a
license class higher than General. To conduct a General license exam, they
must hold either an Advanced or Extra license.

Dee is a cheerleader for Morse Code and the ARRL. That's known as
"bias."

My support of Morse code has no bearing on the number of VEs in Mark's
area
who are eligible to administer the General exam.

Dee, N8UZE

In retrospect, using the "cheerleader" descriptor thus presented, I could
easily make a similar case that his no-code bias is glaringly obvious. Tit
for tat, eh?
Thanks again, Dee.

No-Code is the law of the land. Is that bias?

"Well you came and you gave without takin'
But I sent you away, oh Mandy
Well, you kissed me and stopped me from shakin'
And I need you today, oh Mandy"

Barry Manilow