View Single Post
  #7   Report Post  
Old March 13th 07, 03:36 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
RHF RHF is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,652
Default why not, Why Not. WHY NOT ! - Leave AM Radio Alone

On Mar 12, 6:26 pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:





wrote in message
roups.com...
On Mar 12, 10:17?am, "RHF" wrote:


Why Not a 15KW, 20KW or 25KW "HD" Digital AM/MW
Radio Signal which should be as effective as a 50KW Analog
Radio Signal for a Radio Station that is Broadcasting on an
'closed' Clear Channel.


If the current 1/100th of analog power works fine in the useful / usable
signal range of the analog signal, just a slight increase will make HD more
usable than the analog signal.


"Only 175 or so AM stations have even licensed AM-HD. For a number of
reasons, quite a few have tried it and taken it off the air, or so the
anecdotal evidence suggests. Ibiquity no longer reports in its public
summaries whether a station is on the air."


And those 175 represent about 90% of the viable AMs in the top 100 markets.


You can keep spouting this crap until the cows come home but nobody but
you believes it.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Telamon,

Kim Komando - "America's Digital Goddess"
http://www.komando.com/buyguide/index.aspx?id=3024
would seam to be promoting HD Radio . . .

KOMANDO = http://www.komando.com/
But me thinks that this is focused on FM "HD" Radio
and AM {HD} Radio is not a real issue with her.


hd radio well just may be...
but then again only time will tell ~ RHF