VE Testing Rules
On Mar 11, 5:49 pm, "
wrote:
From: on Sun, Mar 11 2007 5:14 am
On Mar 10, 9:59 pm, wrote:
Jim, get over yourself. The story presented in QST is preposterous.
Only you believed it.
He CANNOT, Brian...:-) He's been dogging this one since 1999
and it must be eating him out internally. It's his own
albatross hung around his neck...and that ancient mariner
just can't make it all rhyme.
What next, three year old Extras??? If this group is any indication,
they'd fit right in.
For example, Jimmie thinks that "AF6AY" wrote a comment to
the FCC in 1998 (accepted on FCC 98-143 on 13 Jan 99) but
that is clearly WRONG. Callsign AF6AY wasn't even close on
the sequential callsign list back then. Jimmie was first
licensed in US amateur radio at age 14 so he bridles at any
mention, even suggestions that a minimum age be set at 14.
Who is Jimmie? That is, who is Jimmie to say?
Jimmie is a champion of OOK CW morse code and gets upset
when others don't think that is "important." Jimmie gets
all upset when others don't worship St. Hiram and all the
things that are old in ham radio. Sigh...
Morse Jihadists. Perhaps they've developed a belt of capacitors, all
highly charged...
I replied to Jim Weir of Grass Valley, CA, and a former
Primary candidate for Governor of California. Jimmie
Miccolis of Pennsylvania has never run for any government
elected position and certainly never served in the military.
Say Hi to Jim for me.
But, Jimmie runs his newsgroup "transceiver" at "full break-
in" whenever he hears my "signal." :-)
Perhaps the FCC will require safties and semi-auto capability in this
new breed of assault transceiver.
It be QRM, with heavy QRN on top of it.
73, Len AF6AY
|