In article . com,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

On Mar 20, 1:27 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Telamon" wrote in message

..
.





In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"HFguy" wrote in message
news:vmILh.1689$zN.16@trndny03...

At this point David, the question is why are you spending so
much time on this group and others, defending HD radio and
your personal life as well. You said a while ago that it
doesn't take much time from your schedule to make all these
responses but it's beginning to look like you must be
compensated in some way to make it worth your time. There are
just too many posts on this subject from someone that
supposedly has more important responsibilities in the radio
industry than arguing on a Usenet group. No one on this group
is going to have any say in the outcome of HD radio, with the
possible exception of someone participating in a listener
survey. So why do you care?

It's amusing, especially while doing things like sitting in
airports, doing airchecks, etc.

But you make one very good point... nobody here will make even a
tiny difference in the success of HD except those working in the
industry.

Yes we are very amused at your BS. Be sure to show these posts to
your circle of imaginary insiders so they can laugh at us and
continue to imagine seeing and hearing that imaginary ASIC at
working in a prototype unit.

And how many HD stations do you work with? And how many markets do
you get monthly and weekly Arbitron data for?

You don't know a thing about the radio industry, as you have proven
over and over again, and the worst thing is that you don't care to
learn. Having $5 k for an expensive radio is not a sign of
knowledge, just of extravagance.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Looking back at your post again, it seems to me that you actually
know a great deal about the radio industry. So, please disregard my
earlier criticism. Sorry.

The commercial aspects of AM radio? Nope.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California