View Single Post
  #7   Report Post  
Old March 25th 07, 06:25 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Sal M. Onella Sal M. Onella is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 442
Default Nutty Antenna Idea -- Complete with Rhetorical Questions


"Jimmie D" wrote in message
...

"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
...
Buck wrote:
If both were the same, I think he would be better off, but it should
turn into a rotatable dipole similar to a multiband beam, but without
the directors and reflectors. I see there is no reason it shouldn't
work once he gets them tuned.


How much would it weigh?
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com


Yeah I thought about that too after my inital post. It would be a bear to
make a rotateable dipole using this if its anything like my old trap
vertical.



I hadn't bargained on rotating it, although that's not out of the question.
I think those verticals are about 20 pounds each, so it would be a project.
I will weigh them tomorrow. I do have a rotator thrust bearing that I once
used with a monster VHF TV antenna.

The Hustler four band (10, 15, 20 , 40) is 35 feet tall. The other antenna
is a five-band, but I don't have the specs here at hand. It's presumably
the same, unless they got 80 with some folding tricks, in which case I don't
know how tall it would be.

Depending on where I would put a rotating 70-foot horizontal antenna, I'm
sure I could either prune my neighbor's tree or make contact with the power
company, via their overhead lines. Did I mention I am on a city street with
a 100 x 100 lot? Hm-m-m -- better not rotate.