View Single Post
  #120   Report Post  
Old March 26th 07, 04:53 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Gene Fuller Gene Fuller is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 342
Default Revisiting the Power Explanation

Cecil Moore wrote:

*** 1 ***

If reflected energy is not dissipated, it undergoes destructive
interference and is redirected back toward the load as constructive
interference instead of being incident upon the source. Why
are you having difficulty with that concept from page 388
of "Optics", by Hecht, 4th edition?


*** 2 ***


Again, reflected power doesn't flow so it doesn't go anywhere.
Until you understand that simple fact of physics, further
discussion is unlikely to yield valid results. "Reflected power
that goes" is only one of your many conceptual flaws. So your
first logical step would be proving that reflected power actually
flows. After you do that, we can continue to your other conceptual
flaws.



Cecil,

Paragraphs 1 and 2 appear to declare exactly the opposite behavior for
energy (power).

Is there some subtle re-definition going on to allow "redirected back
toward the load" and "it doesn't go anywhere" in the same message?

What is it that you are trying to say?

73,
Gene
W4SZ