On Mar 28, 2:48�pm, "Dloyd Lavies" wrote:
On Mar 28, 12:28?pm, wrote:





On 28 Mar 2007 06:17:51 -0700, "Dloyd Lavies"
wrote:

On Mar 28, 12:21?am, wrote:
On 27 Mar 2007 20:13:34 -0700, "Dloyd Lavies"
wrote:

your point

I am responding that your said you were tired of the BS, I agree but I
have no solution, that is your sole responsibilty to find a way to
deal with it without including everyone on the group

I have no such responiblity Dloyd

you OTOH do have a responiblity to refairn from comiting criminal acts

such as the posting harrasing or anoyying post from an false or
deceptive status it is that crime you have been reported for and that
crime a very low priority crime so I am not sanguine about the
likelyhood of result but one does what one can

http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com
stealing data from my wifes accounts is unaccaptable

demdning I do what you conceed I can not or suffer
?further attack is unacepteable
Dloyd Lavies renagade cyber theif and terroist

--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com

"You implied we were at war quoting from the "Art of War", and call me
your foe, did you expect me to restrain my posting. You don't restrain
your posting. You attacked Steve and tried to use the death of his
daughter as nail to drive through his heart to get at Steve, *You made
light of the death of a child, and said she should have been aborted
and somehow he was responsible for her death, how anymore dispicable
can you get, to attack the fact that someone has lost a child. You
wife's sexuality pales in comparison."

Notice how Mark ignored this part of my post. *He claims he is the
"victum" and he keeps it on the net. Yet it is ok for him to go to
another web site (Steve's), obtain information, and use the death of
an innocent child to further his harrassment of Steve. *Mr. Morgan is
a peice of human dung. *Yet with his double standard, when someone
does the same, he calls foul.

Dloyd- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Why don't you address your double standard Mark?