View Single Post
  #11   Report Post  
Old March 29th 07, 06:35 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Cecil Moore[_2_] Cecil Moore[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,521
Default Revisiting the Power Explanation

Keith Dysart wrote:
But truly, do look up lattice diagrams and learn the technique.
The number of problems that you will be able to solve will go
up significantly.


Since your use of it yielded erroneous results, I think
I will pass. However, it appears to be much like the
S-Parameter analysis which does yield correct results.

An S-Parameter analysis indicates that you have made an
error in the reflection coefficient, s11, looking into
the 450 ohm transmission line. From HP's Ap-Note 95-1,
s11 is defined as the "Input reflection coefficient
with the output port TERMINATED BY A MATCHED LOAD."

You calculated your reflection coefficient with the
output port terminated by a mismatched load. There's
your conceptual error! The reflection coefficient, s11,
at the source is *NOT* the same as the reflection
coefficient at the load.

Have you told anyone else that an emitter follower with
a 450 ohm resistor in the emitter circuit will eliminate
reflections on all 450 ohm transmission lines?
--
73, Cecil, w5dxp.com