View Single Post
  #209   Report Post  
Old March 30th 07, 04:42 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Keith Dysart Keith Dysart is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 124
Default Revisiting the Power Explanation

On Mar 29, 7:17 pm, Cecil Moore wrote:
Owen Duffy wrote:
Why is it necessary to complicate the analysis with tracking multiple re-
reflections, potentially an infinite number of reflections of diminishing
significance, an analysis that converges in the limit on the answer given
by the solution of the source V/I characteristic and (Vf+Vr)/If-Ir) at
the input end of the line (which is the equivalent input impedance). Note
that (Vf+Vr)/If-Ir) at the input end of the line is determined solely by
the tranmission line propagation constant, length, Zo and the far end
load impedance, for avoidance of doubt, source impedance is not
relevant.


The answer is subtle. Consider the following lossless example.

XMTR--x--1WL 450 ohm line--y--1WL 450 ohm line--50 ohm load

The SWR is 9:1 everywhere on the 450 ohm line.
(Vf+Vr)/(If+Ir) = 50 ohms at points x and y. There are reflections
to the left of y but no reflections to the left of x. Why?


Did you swap x and y in the second last sentence and really mean
"There are reflections to the left of x but no reflections to
the left of y"?

....Keith