On Mar 29, 2:06�am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"David" wrote in message

...

On 28 Mar 2007 13:18:13 -0700, wrote:

"HD Radio Effort Undermined by Weak Tuners in Expensive Radios"

http://www.mp3newswire.net/stories/7002/hd-radio2.html

Eduardo - all three HD radios failed miserably. Nothing like first
impressions for consumers - no wonder, with repetitive HD programming
(even HD-1 is just a digital copy of the main analog channel -
whoopie) and lousy reception with expensive HD radios, this turkey
will never takeoff !

I have the Recepter. *It needs a proper antenna but works very well on
FM. *The AM sucks.

It is not a particularly good radio... too bad, because the non-HD version
is a pretty good AM radio.

See Eduardo, what I was talking about:

Hey, check this out - radiointel.com, which is popular with radio-
geeks already picked up the "HD Radio Effort Undermined by Weak Tuners
in Expensive Radios" article, and put it on their home page:

"HD Radio Effort Undermined by Weak Tuners in Expensive Radios
[read the MP3 Newswire article] [read the Engadget article] Mar 29"

http://www.radiointel.com/

Now, that's exactly what I was talking about ! What are the chances
of those radio-geeks buying HD radios ? Just one critical HD Radio
story, goes a long way - LOL !!!