In article .com,
wrote:

On Mar 31, 10:14?pm, "RHF" wrote:
For One and All,

Boston Acoustics (BA) Receptor "HD" Radio
?http://www.ccrane.com/radios/hd-radi...recepter-radio...

Sangean HDT-1 "HD" Radio Component
Tunerhttp://www.ccrane.com/radios/hd-radio/sangean-hdt-1-hd-radio-componen..
.

Which is the Better "HD" FM Radio ?
-and- Is and External FM Antenna 'critical'
for "HD" FM Radio Reception ?

More importantly which is the Better "HD" AM/MW Radio ?
-and- Is and External AM/MW Antenna 'critical'
for "HD" AM/MW Radio Reception ?

Do You Own Both ? -or- Have You Used Both ?

Anyone Done Any Side-by-Side Testing ?

i want to know - cause iane ~ RHF
?.
?.
. .

Here, try this:

"Are HD radios made with crappy tuners?"

http://www.hear2.com/2007/03/are_hd_....html#comments

The crock is that you can receive HD signal as well as you can receive
the analog signal when the broadcast power is much lower. This is part
of the HD sales pitch to broadcasters that they can save on the power
bill. It is BS of course. Not only will the broadcasters not save on
transmitter power but they will have to buy a transmitter with the same
capacity to handle the peak power levels so they will not be able to
save money on buying a smaller transmitter either.

"crock" is a good descriptor of the HD sales pitch.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California