Not understanding some parts of wave refraction
On Apr 5, 4:40 pm, Roy Lewallen wrote:
Yes. And it's very, very nearly the same for air.
The 30,000 km would be a typo -- the wavelength in a vacuum at 10 kHz
would be 30 km.
Roy Lewallen, W7EL
Thanks again everyone! It makes sense to me to just treat c, in this
case, as a relative speed dependent on the medium.
|