Constructive interference in radiowave propagation
Cecil Moore wrote:
One more example of an ignorant person making fun of something
he doesn't understand.
Cecil,
Sorry, I simply cannot keep up with you. We seem to be switching from RF
to optics in order to explain something or other, and now we are
switching from optics to S-parameters to explain the explanation.
You accuse me of saying that waves never "cancel", right after I told
you that "cancel" is not a good description in detailed technical
analysis. Do you actually read anything here?
Going back to your oft-stated line about Galileo, you seem to be on the
other side now. You keep insisting on a Cecil-centric universe, with the
consequent requirement to add more and more crystalline spheres to
explain all of your "creative" ideas.
Stick to the basic EM understanding that has stood for more than 100
years. No need to keep inventing new principles. The old ones work just
fine.
(You must be getting desperate; the ad hominem attacks have started.) 8-)
73,
Gene
W4SZ
|