View Single Post
  #16   Report Post  
Old April 9th 07, 03:01 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Keith Dysart Keith Dysart is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 124
Default Constructive interference in radiowave propagation

On Apr 8, 10:20 pm, Cecil Moore wrote:
Keith Dysart wrote:
This is good; a continuum with high coherence at one end, low
coherence at the other and medium in the middle, and, of course,
since the ends are infinitely small, no such thing as perfect
coherence or "NO" coherence (at least in the real world).


But remember that definition is for fiber optics
sources, not amateur radio sources. Coherency
in amateur radio systems can get as close as
a zero reading on a reflected power meter.

Still there are those nagging assertions of Born
and Wolf that for two equal magnitude signals,
the total intensity possible for incoherent
signals is double the intensity of one signal.
The total intensity possible for coherent
signals is four times the intensity of one
signal.


I take this to mean that with largely incoherent sources
the intensity is doubled everywhere.

With largely coherent sources, the average intensity is
doubled everywhere, but there is also a spatial distribution
where the peak intensity is 4 times, but the minimum is zero
(thus the same average of two).

....Keith