Imus Update
Steve wrote:
On Apr 9, 12:52 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Apr 9, 12:25 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message
groups.com...
On Apr 9, 12:07 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
Satellite is not content regulated, but the possibility of a boycott
of a
satellite company or of their advertisers or resellers is possible.-
Hide
quoted text -
Err....yes, that possibility is indeed possible. If you check, I think
you'll find that most possibilities are possible. That's why we call
them "possibilities".
The point is that any action against Imus for terrestrial radio programs
can
be duplicated for satellite. At the same time, there is little or no
regulatory pressure per the FCC rules that can be put on either medium...
unless it went all the way to "fitness as a licensee" which has never
been
applied to content of this type (fitness has been applied to convicted
felons and sex offenders, not to content).
This is consistent with the possibility of possibilities, is it not?
Yeah, if this were alt.usage.english- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
You used the English language in your post, didn't you?
It sure wasn't the Spanin language.
|