On Apr 14, 11:27 am, Richard Clark wrote:
On 14 Apr 2007 09:53:11 -0700, "Jim Kelley" wrote:

What happens to the energy in the canceled waves?

There is no energy "in" cancelled waves.

Hi Jim,

How has this inversion arrived? Cecileo offering emphatic testimony
to the Cardinals "It certainly doesn't move!" and no energy "in"
cancelled waves?

Both waves exist as the absence of either would easily reveal. There
may be no power to extract due to their offsetting contributions, but
that doesn't prove they have vanished (which, in the context of sight,
interference, and light diminishing in regions necessarily demands a
load to demonstrate).

The language of photon shuffling and energy re-distribution lends the
logic of divine intervention to scientific theory. These verbs are
active and require an actor. If we were to travel down that path, the
patterns of intelligent design interference would be explained in
epicycles and crystalline spheres of angels' guiding results.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Hi Richard,

I have to admit that I do have difficulty arguing with nonsense, and
you've caught me at it. I've tried explaining this to Cecil in the
context of energy transfer, but without success. So I'm happy to
leave it to you to explain to Cecil how waves cancel but without
anhiliating the energy "in" them.

73, ac6xg