On Apr 16, 5:34 am, Cecil Moore wrote:
Jim Kelley wrote:
Let us know when HP gets around to ammending its S-Parameter treatise
to include the 4th Mechanism of Reflection.

Please wade through the S-Parameter analysis with me,
see for yourself, and suggest an alternative. The
Florida State web page says the energy involved in
wave cancellation is redistributed "somehow". Wave
cancellation is obviously not a simple reflection
from an impedance discontinuity because it does not
obey the reflection rules.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

Hi Cecil,

I really do appreciate your courteous and patient offer. But in fact,
you have already waded us through that so many times it's kinda funny
that you hope it will somehow turn out differently this time. I don't
understand why the S-parameter analysis is controversial - unless
perhaps you're doing something fanciful with it. If not, it's no lo
contendre. The point of contention is only one or two particular
aspects of your energy analysis. By that I mean _your_ energy
analysis, not Eugene Hechts interference equations (and poor choices
of terms), not B&W's Poynting vector discussion, and not the Hewlett-
Packard s-parameter application note. Although you do frequently
quote, paraphrase, and presume to speak on their behalf, those people
do not post your ideas to rec.radio.amateur.antenna.

73, Jim AC6XG