On 18 Apr, 13:36, Richard Clark wrote:
On 18 Apr 2007 13:07:43 -0700, art wrote:

I was rereading this thread as to why people have a hard time in
understanding Gauss's law
with respect to conservative fields and a transition to a non
conservative field where with the addition of time one can consider
what is outside the enclosed surface.

Hi Art,

That single, obscure, and ponderously long sentence is a clue as to
why...

since at the cessation of time interaction between elements is still
taking place after the cessation of time.

One has to wonder what new meaning you have for the word "cessation."

How can there be any time (for anything to take place) when there is
no more time (for anything to take place).

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

When power supply is stopped to an array inside an enclosed surface
kinetic energy is in evidence by radiation between elements PRIOR to
emerging from the enclosed surface.
You cannot have an equation with reference to time if equality is not
obtained at the cessation of the time under consideration.
You should read up on conservative and non conservative fields before
you succumb to temptation by replying while you still have your foot
in your mouth. I have responded to you this one time only to show
others how stupid you can be when you allow animosity to over ride
cfommon sense.