View Single Post
  #114   Report Post  
Old April 19th 07, 08:48 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
art art is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,188
Default Gaussian statics law

On 19 Apr, 10:59, Richard Clark wrote:
On 19 Apr 2007 09:56:45 -0700, art wrote:

Only one person came forward to
acknoweledged the presence of conclusive mathematical support supplied
by
John Davis


Hi Art,

He confirmed it was Maxwell's (Heavisides actually) equations. I
provided the actual quotes. If you wish, you can consult the same
reference we BOTH used: "The Feynman Lectures on Physics," or I can
rummage up that material again.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


It was only AFTER the intervention did you aknoweledged the undeniable
truth of what
Dr Davis presented. Before then the debate was about the legitamacy of
adding time to both sides to the Gaussian law on statics. You posted
often in that debate as did all the other experts all in total denial
of the veracity of what I stated. True many of your posts are clounded
with flowery language to emphasis your position but never did a
specific point make it thru to any sort of objective. At any time you
or anybody could have turned around in your thinking and point your
spear in the ground alongside me but none did. Even after the
intervention of Dr Davis only one person followed thru until personal
satisfaction was obtained
regarding the mathematics. I seem to remember an obscure posting that
you made towards
Dr Davis that seemed to have undertones of disagreement but ithe prose
was difficult to understand so there is no personal credit you can
steal for your self, you had posted so many times prior to that time
in dissent. In years to come this thread will be read time and time
again as evidence of the multi pseudo experts who lived on this
newsgroup that argued without any grounds whatso ever about science
and Gaussian antennas and I will cherish that time as the so called
experts are finally exposed for what they are to the amateur radio
fraternity. Ofcourse you could re write all of your posts such that
true scientific data could penetrate the maze place in the way to
prove your position one way or another or even point to the chapter
that you were first to disclose to the world the veracity of what I
had to say but then you can't because it doesn't exist, many have
spoken of this proof but none have been able to deliver and neither
can you. Richard you are a fraud.