Analyzing Stub Matching with Reflection Coefficients
Cecil Moore wrote:
Gene Fuller wrote:
We are talking steady state, remember? You need to dig a bit deeper. I
won't hold my breath waiting. I will give you extra credit for a vivid
imagination, however.
This is steady-state after the wave interaction. What
you guys don't seem to realize is that s11(a1) and
s12(a2) are continually changing, continually
interacting, and a1 & a2 are rotating phasors
changing with time.
Cecil,
Utter nonsense. Any setup that includes t0 or t=0 is not steady state.
73,
Gene
W4SZ
|