View Single Post
  #5   Report Post  
Old April 27th 07, 01:28 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
AF6AY AF6AY is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 229
Default 60 Days Since Code Test Cessation Compared

On Apr 26, 11:00�am, John Smith I wrote:
AF6AY wrote:

* ...

The overall losses of all licensees (all classes including Club and
Grace
Period) over the previous two years were 11,143 *[11.528]. *This is
approximately the same for each period.


73, Len *AF6AY


The data is most likely skewed because of inherent errors in the
"license census" tally.


JS, there is no "census" of numbers on the www.hamdata.com site.
They take their data download from the FCC's huge amateur radio
database file and sort that. That's what the ARRL does, that's what
QRZ does, that's what everyone else does.

The FCC database has specific fields indicating who is NEW and
the duration of all granted licensees. Adding two years to the
given expiration date is a trivial program task. The two years are
for the grace period.

The FCC does the record keeping for the licenses the FCC grants.

No "baby boom" enters this simple picture of numbers, no inferences.

There are just licensees in the U.S. amateur radio service.

73, Len AF6AY