On Apr 26, 9:48 pm, Cecil Moore wrote:
Keith Dysart wrote:
It just does NOT model it.

You got it. Einstein said an explanation should be as
simple as possible, but not too simple. There is too
much evidence gathered over decades of arguments for
simple-minded models to work anywhere except in your
dreams.

Okay, so you can't find anything to point at that is wrong
with the model. You could always ask. I could point to a
few things that are arguably weak with the model.

Your earlier example proved it. In a source with
absolute zero power, you claimed that all the
reflected power was being dissipated in that
source.

Of course I claimed no such thing; you do need to read
more carefully. And you have conveniently neglected the
other example which was presented right beside for
which 4 times the "reflected power" was dissipated by
the source. These two copmletely different results
call into question the nature of "reflected power".

....Keith