Keith Dysart wrote:
Okay, so you can't find anything to point at that is wrong
with the model.

What is wrong with the model is that it doesn't work
in reality. Neither does the 6000 year old model of
the age of the earth.

Of course I claimed no such thing; you do need to read
more carefully. And you have conveniently neglected the
other example which was presented right beside for
which 4 times the "reflected power" was dissipated by
the source. These two copmletely different results
call into question the nature of "reflected power".

No, they call into question the validity of the model.
The reflected energy is there and can be dissipated
by a circulator load. That the model gets it wrong is
proof of an invalid model, not proof that photons
contain zero energy. Photons contain energy that obeys
the conservation of energy principle.

The fact that zero energy is dissipated in a source
is prima facie evidence of destructive interference
and a "redistribution of energy in a direction that
allows constructive interference". Understanding
interference is the key and your model doesn't even
mention interference.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com