On Apr 30, 9:05 pm, qquito wrote:
Hello, All:

As my first post two years ago indicated that I bought an atomic clock
in February, 2005, and it worked fine until July, 2005 when the clock
started to display arbitrary Month, Date, Day, etc..

Michael Black suggested (in July, 2005) that I change the battery.
Well, I did not. I wanted to see how far it could go. After three or
four or five days, it resumed normal.

And then in August, 2006 (as far as I can recall), the same thing
happened again. I did not change the battery and the malfunctioning
was gone after three or four days.

And it has since been normal. It is 2 years and 2 months since I
bought it and I have never changed the battery.

--Roland

"qquito" wrote in message

Hello, Everyone:
I bought an "atomic clock" in February, 2005, and it has since been
working fine. I live on the eastern coast and now use EDT.
But then at about 2:00 PM, July 20, 2005, I noticed the clock display
"SAT" while it was actually "WED". The Month, Date, Hour, Minute, and
Second were all correct, though. Also, the logo of a radio wave tower
was on, meaning the clock had received the NIST signal for the day.
When I got home after midnight (It was now July 21), the clock
displayed "THU" correctly.
Could it have been that NIST sent a wrong signal for the weekday on
July 20, 2005?

Michael Black
Date: 24 Jul 2005 02:16:36 GMT
Local: Sun, Jul 24 2005 10:16 pm
Subject: An NIST Mistake on "Atomic Clock"

......

Have you changed the battery? I can see the clock acting up because
the battery is low, and then not getting proper reception to resync
properly.

QQUITO - More likely that there is something in your area
that is interferring with the Time Signal and you will simply
have to live with it -or- more. ~ RHF