Keith Dysart wrote:
 On May 10, 6:29 am, "Jimmie D"  wrote:
 No, Its an illusion. The same thing happens when you view an AM signal. On
 an oscilloscope the pattern you see may give you the impression that the
 carrier is changing in amplitude with the modulation. Perhaps standing waves
 are this same type of illusion.
 
 I am unsure why you would call this an illusion.
 
 The modulated waveform can be accurately described by
      (f(t)+1)*cos(2*pi*fc*t)   where f(t) is the modulating signal
 
 from which it is easy to discern that the amplitude is changing
 with the modulation.
 
 There is often more than one way to describe an observation and
 the existence of this description in no way detracts from the
 alternative which has a carrier plus and minus the modulating
 signal.
 
 Many of the arguments here do seem to be of the form "You
 say tomatoe and I say tomatoe", but the important point is
 that the appropriate description be used for the problem at
 hand. Filter design is probably better done with the latter,
 while modulators and envelope detectors are likely better
 analyzed with the former.
 
 But I find no reason to declare one to be less of an illusion than
 the other.
 
 You are correct though; this is exactly like the arguments
 about "standing waves" and "travelling waves". The mathematical
 expressions for each accurately describe the voltage and
 current distribution on the line, yet some wish to argue that one
 description is more real than the other.
 
 They are equally real and equally illusions. The important point
 is to choose the one that best helps solve whatever problem is
 at hand and not to get carried away with a belief that one is more
 real than the other.
 
 ...Keith
 
Thank you for nicely elucidating the 
distinctions in emphasis between 
"science" and engineering, Keith.
I believe a perfect (just to keep this 
at an abstract level) SA reveals the 
underlying reality of the modulated AM 
carrier.
An oscilloscope displays a waveform that 
can be mathematically derived from the 
underlying reality. On the scope, it is 
produced by electronically combining 
three (assumed) sine waves. Without the 
mathematical or electronic operations, I 
suggest the waveform displayed by the 
scope does not exist.
Mathematical equivalence between time 
and frequency domains does not 
demonstrate (in my humble opinion) a 
duality in the underlying reality.
In reality, there are only the original 
three frequencies which can be 
demonstrated by selective filtering. 
Whether the oscilloscope waveform is an 
illusion is perhaps a semantic issue 
since it is an artifact constructed 
from, and convertible at will back into 
the three continuously existing sine 
waves which never surrender their 
independent qualities.
Quite a bit of difference from 
transmission line standing waves, no?
My $02.
Chuck
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----