Water burns!
On 5 Jun, 04:30, Denny wrote:
I would be very much encouraged if
just one person acknoweledged the Gaussian aproach but sadly
this newsgroup is for arguments and ridicule.
Art
I have not critiqued in any post I have made, your Gaussian approach -
not that I expect you have a grid on the wall and are keeping score -
your method of combining Gauss, time, and classic EMF theory is beyond
my mathematical abilities... Where is Dick Feynman when you need
him...
Return with us now to those thrilling days of yesteryear the cultural
reference will not be familiar to you and focus on burning water no,
not Jack Daniels...
I am willing to learn - so what in those photos and the captions do
you see is new physics? That is what is confusing me...
Plasma physics are well known again, I personally only know what I
read on the topic... However, in a previous lifetime I was
responsible for keeping a herd of 100KW RF induction heaters working,
so I have some understanding of what high intensity EMF can and cannot
do..
The fact that it does not work on pure water non conductive but has
to have a conductor a salt added to it is a flaming directional
arrow in the wilderness...
The fact that the flame color indicates sodium ions are being heated
above the wick is to me, as an old lab chemist, a futher indication as
to mechanism...
The real issue here is what use is this particular method of plasma
induction? Interesting - yes...
Useful - questionable
A new source of power - highly suspect...
denny / k8do
Well said
Art
|